Doom, don't waste your time arguing with Gom. Can't you see that he uses stupidity to derail arguments that he can't debunk? It doesn't matter how many points you throw at him. All he's gonna do is reply with a stupid gif file, or a youtube video that has nothing to do with the topic.
I'm aware of that, but in the other homosexuality thread i made, i seen that you were going back and forward with him. I read a few of it and I was like: Gom's just derailing the thread, and he avoids the topic. I just give him a quick and easy answer, and I will always try to make him stay on the topic since derailing threads is all he's about. Other than that, I just ignore him. (you'll be surprised how that can work on a troll's nerves.) He'll get mad and call me a maggot, but hey...he needs to pay attention.
Not as worried about embarrassing HIM so much as ruining his credibility. On boards such as TWeb, if he did what he was doing nobody would think anything of him, but here it actually looks like he's answering the material.
This coming from a person which never presented anything except logical falsities and pure bullshit as "arguments".
Yeah. You really are clueless... so tell me... why should I bother? I know I'm right, why should I care to prove it to anyone?
This is going to be fun, watching you wiggle out of this. I NEVER made any arguments? Yeah, like these bunches you dodged like they didn't exist:
http://www.sheezyart.com/forum/topic/72085/
http://www.sheezyart.com/forum/topic/119464/ <- this one especially where you show how much you confuse religion with science, rofl.
http://www.sheezyart.com/journal/486232/
http://www.sheezyart.com/forum/topic/102771/ Me vs Mud Lobster, even
Pick one and refute it. Or you can take your lickings far faster at TWeb. Up to you.
(shrug) Whatever, man. If you so enjoy proving to everyone that you don't have any arguments (by refusing to actually deal with the ones you are pretending I don't have) you can do so on other folk now.
It's not that you don't have arguments. It's that all your arguments are pathetic logical falsities.
Categories of typical Doomie arguments - all of the refute themselves:
- argumentum ad verecundiam, commonly known as appeal to authority
- argumentum ad ignorantiam, commonly known as being stupid
- argumentum ad populum, also known as sheep instinct
- argumentum ad hominem, commonly misunderstood to be something else by plebeians such as you
- non sequitur argument, also known as being confused about logic
- petitio principii, commonly known as answering your own question
- enthymeme, commonly known as not thinking something over
- cherry picking/quote mining, commonly known as abandoning a sinking ship
- arguing semantics, also known as being stupid
- circular reasoning, also known as ROUND ROUND BABY ROUND ROUND.
- argument from design/argument from scripture, also known as being close minded due to sensus divinitatis
The only other type of argument you ever made was irrelevant to the discussion, also ad hoc arguments about.
Wow... fail moar? Is that like... even possible?
-Yaaaaawn-...
But you see... this is why I stopped posting in the forum - it got boring. You can only repeat the same arguments that have been refuted a thousand times over and hope that someone won't notice. In short I felt the forum has become an used hooker and it's time to ditch it and find some new entertainment.
...unless you are trying to spare me the same game, I don't see the point of you embarrassing yourself in front of me any more than you are right now. ESPECIALLY that Appeal to Authority one. I'm guessing you don't even know how using logic in an argument is appealing to logic as an authority itself.
In fact, you calling Appeal to Authority self-refuting is pure fail. You KNOW that it is not fallacious as long as the authority being cited is an actual authority (you know, not refuted, not dishonest, not mistaken).
But I'm feeling a bit more masochistic so I'll give ya a necro'd argument: Remember that ridiculously stupid conclusion you came to regarding homosexual arguments? "If there are no logically sound arguments against homosexuality, then arguing against homosexuality is homophobic"? I shouldn't even have to tell you why that's wrong.
I never said they would convert to anything, just that when shown their system is wrong that they'd DEconvert. So yeah, a massive failure on your end to read carefully. Just like that appeal to authority page that you cited.
Why do you think I'd de-convert anyone except for the sole purpose of converting him to a Satanist?
Would you preach to someone in order to convert them to Hinduism? I do not think so.
Thus you are incorrect in your assumption about my understanding of your poorly though out argument.
Doomrater: "The appeal to authority page is massive failure."
Me: "Why."
Doomrater: proceeds to bury self under a even larger stack of logical fallacies.
There. I did it for you so you don't have to do it yourself.
Submit Artwork 
Manage Artwork 
Manage Journal 
Messages 
Watch List 
Settings 
Logout 
Upgrade 
Profile
Watchers
Friends
Featured Artwork
Artwork
Flashy: Taking apart GunFlash states
Favorites
D I'm sure they'll all be amused to hear that one.
Comments
